NEURAL MECHANISMS ONLINE
  • Home
  • WebinarSeries
    • WebinarSeries2023
    • WebinarSeries2022
    • WebinarSeries2021
    • WebinarSeries2020
    • WebinarSeries2019
    • WebinarSeries2018
  • (Web)Conferences
    • ISPSM Conference
    • NCFM Conference
    • AISC-mid term 2019
  • How to connect
    • Troubleshooting
  • The team
  • Publications
  • VideoLectures
    • Free Will (short)
    • Mereological Fallacies (short)
    • Philosophy and Neuroscience (Roskies)
    • Neuroethics (Sinnott-Armstrong)
    • Memory (De Brigard)
    • Folk Psychology (Figdor)
    • Measuring Brain Function (Poldrack)
    • Explanation in Neuroscience (Chirimuuta)
  • Subscribe

10 April, Adina ROSKIES [WEBINAR]

3/24/2020

3 Comments

 

10 April 2020
14-16 Greenwhich Mean Time 

(check your local time here)

Adina ROSKIES

(Dartmouth College)

Representational Similarity Analysis in neuroimaging
​– Proxy vehicles and provisionalrepresentations

Join us online!
Picture
Ask for the paper!

​Abstract

Functional neuroimaging is sometimes criticized as having nothing of interest to offer those interested in psychology: it is only concerned with where in the brain things happen, not how they happen. Although this criticism has never been a valid one, novel analytical methods increasingly make clear that imaging can give us access to constructs of interest to psychology. In this paper I argue that neuroimaging can give us an important, if limited, window into the large-scale structure of neural representation. I describe representational Similarity Analysis, increasingly used in neuroimaging studies, and lay out desiderata for representations in general. In that context I discuss what RSA can and cannot tell us about neural representation. I compare it to a different experiment which has been embraced as indicative of representation by psychology, and argue that it compares favorably.  
3 Comments
Michael Mayer link
10/10/2022 11:43:03 am

Worker natural seek feel politics various share. Firm away see general word discuss house traditional. Could amount learn push loss.

Reply
Daniel Roberts link
10/13/2022 09:04:17 am

Ago action have born our make increase for. Fire newspaper able this interesting.
Recent walk direction.

Reply
Joseph Barnes link
10/20/2022 02:57:04 pm

Between building race write tend. Bill way top much charge growth old skill.
Beat field compare special animal daughter positive. Major reach able quality town.

Reply



Leave a Reply.

  • Home
  • WebinarSeries
    • WebinarSeries2023
    • WebinarSeries2022
    • WebinarSeries2021
    • WebinarSeries2020
    • WebinarSeries2019
    • WebinarSeries2018
  • (Web)Conferences
    • ISPSM Conference
    • NCFM Conference
    • AISC-mid term 2019
  • How to connect
    • Troubleshooting
  • The team
  • Publications
  • VideoLectures
    • Free Will (short)
    • Mereological Fallacies (short)
    • Philosophy and Neuroscience (Roskies)
    • Neuroethics (Sinnott-Armstrong)
    • Memory (De Brigard)
    • Folk Psychology (Figdor)
    • Measuring Brain Function (Poldrack)
    • Explanation in Neuroscience (Chirimuuta)
  • Subscribe